Which Film is Better?


Who We Are and What We Are Doing...

Two movie fans from Georgia give their opinions (usually opposite) on modern films. Sometimes these films will be popular popcorn films, some will be obscure arthouse films, and we are always open to suggestions for films to review.

Sunday, January 31, 2010

Edge of Darkness

Hello everyone! We had a great week of watching movies and we would like to share our reviews of one of those- The Mel Gibson comeback, Edge of Darkness. I hope you enjoy this review enough to come back next time!


Edge of Darkness
When his daughter is murdered, police detective, Thomas Craven, delves into investigating her murder. What he discovers is corporate lies, government corruption, and a minefield of secrets his daughter was keeping. With the help of his daughter's friends and the government agent sent to clean up the mess of the murder of Craven's daughter, Craven goes on the hunt.
Becky's Review
I love a good revenge movie. If a film has a stand up and cheer moment, I'm the kind of girl who likes to stand up and cheer. Edge of Darkness has some stand up and cheer moments...three or four of them in fact. That makes me happy.
I was delighted to see Mel back on the big screen in a leading role. With all due respect to Passion of the Christ (2004) and Apocalypto (2006), acting is where Gibson shines - though he seems to have an affection for roles of bereaved fathers. Let me just say that Gibson does Martin Campbell proud in Edge of Darkness. His performance is, if not masterful, then convincing.
The very first scene of the movie serves to make the audience nervous, and this nervousness stays with you throughout the first twenty minutes of the movie, despite Craven's (Gibson) domestic appearance. The murder of his daughter, coming on the heels of a mundane period in the movie, is absolutely vicious and traumatic. The scene will stick with me for a very long time to come. What follows, Craven's investigation and all of the people he comes into contact with, is a study in fine directing.
Martin Campbell does a wonderful job directing his star-studded cast. As Gibson moves among his colleagues and friends, there is an awkward, almost embarrassed air about the meetings. It is almost possible to hear what the characters are thinking as they come into contact with the bereaved Craven. There are awkard pauses and silences that only add to the tension of the movie, so that by the time the climax of the film rolls around, the audience is as tense as the characters.
All in all, this was a great film! I thoroughly enjoyed it, although, every time Danny Huston (Craven's daughter's boss) came onto the screen, I found myself comparing him to Ray Wise's Devil from the TV show Reaper. They dressed and even looked the same. Perhaps this was on purpose...
Becky's Final Grade: B+
Becky's Final Recommendation: Go see it. Definitely go see it.

Scott's Review

Martin Campbell (Casino Royale, The Legend of Zorro), directs this revenge thriller starring Mel Gibson, and I couldn't be happier to see Mel back on the big screen.
The film opens with a scene that wouldn't be out of place in a Hitchcock thriller and it works very well, asit gives the film a sense of foreboding. The next few scenes seem a little fast and choppy, and at the time I didn't know what they were going for. However, there is a massive SHOCK shortly after. It is at this time that we realize what we are watching.
Yes, we are watching a revenge thriller, but this one goes beyond the formula and works hard to create something smarter (sometimes is succeeds, sometimes it doesn't). By the time we get to Ray Winstone's character, we are in need of something to break the monotony, and that is exactly what Winstone gives us. He is the mysterious character we usually see in these types of films, and none have played it better. I can't say enough about his performance, and can't say much more without posting spoilers. This film has quite a few twists to keep the viewer entertained and guessing. It has politics, revenge, violence, and definitely deserves it R rating. There are quite a few shocking scenes of violence that I wasn't expecting, but to a horror buff such as myself, this serves as redeeming value.
Mel Gibson gives a great performance, and though I thought he could've done without the Boston accent, I didn't even notice it after the first 45 minutes. He is believable in his role as......well I won't say what he is.....spoilers and all that. I enjoyed this film and though I won't remember it in a year, I can't say much bad about it right now.
Scott's Final Grade: B
Scott'sFinal Recommendations:
See it as long as you don't mind a little blood and some fairly brutal scenes.

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Mid-Week "Masterpiece"

Happy Tuesday everyone!
This is the first Mid-Week Masterpiece post, and as you will see, masterpiece is a relative term here. As I said in our last weekend post, I am a fan of genre films, and I plan to post a new genre film review every Tuesday. These are usually films Becky wouldn't be caught dead watching, or is too nice to hurt my feelings by "tearing it a new one" in a review. I am sure some of you will agree with her when it comes to these films and that is great. Just write in and tell me how wrong I am. I don't mind a bit.
In these Tuesday posts I will review anything that could be tagged as a genre film (within reason), and these include spaghetti westerns, Euro-horror, Euro-crime, Ozploitation, Blaxploitation, Cult horror, Giallo, among others. If you have any ideas and would like to see a review of a genre picture that you enjoy (or hate for that matter), just send a comment or an email and let me know.
Ok. Now on to the first Mid-Week Masterpiece review


The Inglorious Bastards (1978)
Let me start off by saying, "calm down." I know Inglourious Basterds has been reviewed hundreds of times by hundreds of critics, but this is the 1978 Enzo Castellari Italian action film by sort of the same name (compare the spelling). However, I will not pit these two film against each other as they are two completely different movies and though they have a few things in common, this is the last time I will mention Tarentino's masterpiece in this review.
A short synopsis of this film is: A group of American soldiers are being transported to a German military prison, but in the process are attacked by a German militia and the prisoners escape. The rest of the film shows the prisoner trying to reach neutral Switzerland until they can be rescued and transported back to the US.
Most of this film is action-packed, and the action is done very well. Though obviously choreographed, I was drawn into these action scenes, despite the cartoonish and bloodless sequences, or maybe because of it. This is not your typical run-of-the-mill 1970s action film, and what I like most about this film is that it knows what it is. It is a fun action romp with a simple story and this gives time for the characters to bring a dimension to the film that many action pictures are lacking, pure unadulterated fun. This is the first time I have seen a killer slingshot and a polearm used in a modern action movie, and it works!
I wont give much more away but definitely wanna say, Fred Williamson was AWESOME in this movie. He is better known in his blaxploitation roles, but he is a standout in this film. He provides good comic relief and quite an intimidating presence. Some of the racially motivated humor can be a bit much, but works here.

Scott's Final Score: A-

Scott's Final Recommendation:
If you are an action fan, this is a must-see. Go rent it now, but don't take it too seriously.


Saturday, January 23, 2010

Werewolves Ate Michael Clayton

For our weekend post, we decided on Tony Gilroy's 2007 crime drama, Michael Clayton and the 2002 cult horror film directed by Neil Marshall, Dog Soldiers.

Michael Clayton
Michael Clayton (played by George Clooney) is a clean-up man for a large law firm. He is sent to clean up the dirtier cases presented to his employers, such as hit and run cases that involve prominent politicians. An old friend has been working a very large case and has had some sort of mental breakdown, and Clayton is sent in to clean up the mess. His friend, Arthur Edens (played by Tom Wilkinson), has become obsessed with the primary plaintiff in the case he's working, and as Clayton tries to fix the problem he becomes embroiled in the case. Murder, madness, and mayhem ensues.
Scott's Review
With Michael Clayton and all the fanfare surrounding it, I went in expecting a well-acted, well-directed, and well-written film. Does it live up to the hype? Well, the answer is mosly "yes."
The film opens with a thought-provoking - if not almost insane - tirade from Tom Wilkinson in voice over. This narration leads into one of the best scenes in the film which I will not spoil, but I will say it was a major surprise and set the tone for the rest of the film.
Michael Clayton is rather deliberately paced, but the acting was so engrossing that the pacing wasn't off-putting at all. Tony Gilroy's script pops with intelligent dialogue and is quite reminiscent of a Jason Reitman script with Steven Soderbergh direction. I also mention Reitman because Clooney's performance reminded me a lot of his work in Up In the Air (2009), which was a more subdued role for George Clooney.
By the time Tom Wilkinson hits the screen, the Michael Clayton character has been fairly well-established, so this allows Wilkinson to steal the show without overshadowing Clooney's character. This film was nominated for three acting Oscars for Clooney, Wilkinson, and Tilda Swinton. In my opinion, Wilkinson was more deserving of an Oscar win than Swinton. His rantings throughout the movie were engaging and believable, and while he was on-screen, I had thoughts of Jack Nicholson in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest (1975).
Swinton's character, Karen Crowder, is the main antagonist in this film, and frankly, at first, I was quite underwhelmed by her performance. Though I am still skeptical of the Oscar win, the more I ponder this performance, the more I warm up to it. I now see flashes of brilliance in this performance through her facial expressions and the total transformation versus any other performance she has done.
I realize I am takling more about the performances than the story and plot of Michael Clayton, but this film is all about the performances. Even a scene of violence about two thirds of the way through the movie is very well-shot and disturbing. It is all due to the performance of the antagonist.
On the down-side, some of the acting is a bit over the top by a few of the bit players. But, it never took me out of the film.
My final grade for Michael Clayton: A-
My final recommendation: Anyone who is not put off by a slower moving story should watch this film.
Becky's Review
I'm not a fan of crime drama. Never really have been. That being said, I expected Michael Clayton to be somewhat boring to my tastes, but well-acted, well-directed, and well-shot. Everyone I know who has seen it has sung its praises and it got great reviews, so, at the very least, I was hoping for some entertainment. I was somewhat satisfied.
The opening Voice Over delivered by Tom Wilkinson was very promising. It drew me into the movie, and I was fully expecting the rest of the movie to be just as explosive as Wilkinson's lines. No, this was not to be. Michael Clayton is a study in understatement. Though the subject matter is inflammatory, the story seemed almost sedate in several places. Even as Clayton is being yelled at by a panicked client, I could almost sense the Ambien in his pocket. He didn't seem to show very much emotion. The same can be said of Karen Crowder. Her character is very understated, though this is actually a good thing for her character.
Swinton plays the antagonist in Michael Clayton, and the unassuming nature of her character makes her actions seem all the more attrocious. The only problem is, given the sedate nature of Swinton's and Clooney's characters, Wilkinson's character - a manic depressive lawyer who has gone over the deep end - seems all the more outrageous, and somewhat out of place. On the bright side, however, Wilkinson provides the comedy relief that keeps the movie moving.
Michael Clayton has been described as deliberately paced on several occasions. I have to agree, though I'd be more inclined to call it slow. The story is very convoluted for the first half, but if one can persevere through the first 45 minutes of the story, one will be rewarded by a very interesting second half of the story, and a stand-up-and-cheer ending.
So far, I've only discussed the negative aspects of this film. However, there are gems aplenty in Michael Clayton. Often I found myself dazzled by the cinematography. Clayton's surroundings seem to be affected by his moods. At the start of the movie, when Clayton has sort of hit rock bottom, the world around him is dark, almost dirty. It becomes brighter and cleaner when the plot shifts to four days in the past. Later, in keeping with the understated theme of the movie, we are treated - if you will pardon the use of this word - to a very well-executed murder scene. It is short, spartan, and absolutely the most cold-blooded murder scene I've ever watched. An amazingly well-done part. Although the movie does have its hang-ups, it also has enough movie magic to make it a pretty good watch.
My final grade: B
My final recommendation: IF you are a fan of crime dramas and if you can persever past the first 40 minutes, you'll enjoy this movie.
Dog Soldiers
A routine military training exercise goes horribly awry when a group of British soldiers discover the remains of the special forces troupe they were supposed to be training with. Suddenly, the soldiers find themselves being chased through the woods by an unknown creature. They are rescued by a young woman who drives them out of the woods to a secluded and seemingly-empty old house where they try to make a stand against what they are gradually coming to realize are werewolves. As the night moves on, internal strife and betrayal threatens to destroy them all before the creatures have a chance to do so.
Scott's Review
I was very excited about finally watching Dog Soldiers because of the great reviews and all the hype surrounding it by genre fans (which I am one of), but it always for one reason or another slipped by me. So, the question was, "would I be as enthusiastic when the film was over?" The anwer is, "No."
This film started with a scene that was as campy as anything I have seen in the last five years. This disappointed me because it wasn't the fun kind of campy, but within 15 minutes, the film redeemed itself with some very good acting by the British cast. It is not a spoiler to tell you that a scene with soldiers around a campfire listening to old war stories was very well-done. The story was engrossing and brought me right back into the film.
Only to let me down 5 minutes later.
Some of the violent scenes close to the beginning of the movie are poorly shot and though the film realizes it is a B film, it doesn't alway make the right choices for special effects. Dog Soldiers definitely gains a few points with me by using practical special effects and very little CGI, but the obvious use of sausages as human entrails made me laugh instead of cringe. Maybe this was the plan all along, but it didn't quite work for me.
The scene about 40 to 45 minutes in of vehicle mutilation is almost as campy as the opening scene. This is no fault of the actors, as most of the acting in this film is very well-done, and the director seems to be very proficient at directing actors.
The first reveal which includes the revelation that the soldiers are being chased by werewolves is pretty clunky and it is almost laughable that they didn't already know, and despite the proficient acting, this scene made me dislike the characters and it never brought me back in. The cliches started with this scene and just kept coming. For example, a gun does you no good if you're going to stand with you back to an open window...idiot. Even worse than these cliches, the werewolves are total wusses and are only strong when it is convenient to the scene, but I kept trying to tell myself, "At least the make-up is practical."
Even though I have discussed mostly the negative aspects of this film, it has three major things going for it: The acting, the writing, and the last 15 minutes. Although the final reveal did not surprise me, everything after that was a blast. This film realized it was low budget and made some good choices, so I can't consider a movie with practical special effects, pretty good writing, really good acting, and a better than average ending a total loss.
My final grade for Dog Soldiers: C
My final recommendation: Fans of genre films should see this one.
Becky's Review
I have to admit, I thoroughly enjoyed this movie. There were bits that were campy, there were bits that were down-right silly. However, there were also moments that were well-done and well-acted. There were cringe worthy moments, and there were laugh-out-loud moments, and I have to tell you, I learned a whole LOT about British vernacular. The opening scene of the movie, though a bit campy, was imperative to the plot, so I was able to just shrug it off. And I was quite surprised by the werewolves. They were actually a lot of fun (until later on in the movie, but we'll get to that later).
The first twenty minutes of the movie are devoted to allowing us as the audience get to know the British soldiers. The camaraderie between the men is very believable and allows us to become attached to them. Later, after the soldiers have discovered the decimated camp of their training mates and are running through the woods away from the "creatures," the first chink in the movie's armor appears. The music in the movie is great and very engaging. However, it is somewhat overly ambitious and not exactly earned. They are terrified, running through the woods, and the music in the background sounds like music that should be play during the climax of the movie, which doesn't occur until later. Normally, I'm not so picky that I would pick on the music so early in the story, but it made the whole scene seem off kilter.
Dog Soldiers is very well-paced and the story is great. The acting is better than average and the direction is just as good. However, somewhere in all that talent, something went amok. These men have been rescued and are holed up in an isolated farm house. The family that usually lives there is absent, and the men have boarded up the windows. The creatures, what they are gradually beginning to learn are werewolves, are trying to beat in the doors and are breaking through the windows. The soldiers have worked out for themselves that all they need to do is survive until morning when the full moon is gone. So, out of this information, three problems arise. Number 1. The moon they show is most definitely not even close to full. The quest is, did they do this on purpose? If not, they certainly never addressed it. Number 2. What kind of dimwit is going to stand with his back three inches in front of the window while he loads his gun. This was a very unbelievable part, and it happens not once, but twice! and Number 3. If you had discovered that all you needed to do to get out of the mess you were in was wait until the sun came up, would you still try to escape? Hell, no! At least I wouldn't. I'd be finding the deepest, darkest hole I could find and hiding there until the dawn! NOT trying to hotwire the nearest car and trying to get out with a very shaky escape plan.
I suppose every horror flick has its problems. The problems in Dog Soldiers were not enough to ruin the story however. Afterall, the world is just a better place when someone breaks out the Claymore! I thought it was a truly enjoyable Werewolf flick!
My final grade: B-
My final recommendation: If you're a fan of horror, action, or the werewolf genre, watch it.
I want to thank everyone who have become followers of Georgia Videophiles and welcome all of you. To thank you, we are opening up the comment section of the blog to suggestions for reviews. One weekend out of each month, we will take at random two of the films suggested in this manner and have a reader appreciation post by reviewing these films for you and we will welcome your review of these films, as well. However, you do not need to wait until this time to send us your reviews, lists, or comments. We're always happy to hear from you and we will answer every comment either in the comment section or if you comment to us by e-mail, we promise to return your e-mail. We will have another post either Tuesday or Wednesday which will be a more obscure genre film. Thank you for reading!

Sunday, January 17, 2010

Our Top Ten of 2009

Well, it is a new year and we kind of hate to see 2009 go. As Becky and I were compiling our list of movies for our top ten lists, we realized 2009 was the best year for films that we can remember. The Hollywood blockbusters had a few surprise gems, the smaller studios and indie filmmakers had an excellent year as well. 2009 was my favorite year for horror films yet (as you will see in my top ten as well as the honorable mentions). Here are our lists, and we welcome feedback, positive or negative (as long as it is constructive). These lists will give you an idea of the difference in mine and Becky's tastes, and help you to see what you are getting yourself into

by following our blog :)





Scott's Top 10 2009


1. Inglourious Basterds

2. The Hurt Locker

3. Let the Right One In

4. Up in the Air

5. Antichrist

6. Star Trek

7. Zombieland

8. District 9

9. Trick R Treat

10. The House of the Devil



Honorable Mention


Drag Me To Hell

Moon

The Hangover

Up

Sherlock Holmes

Watchmen

Precious

Gomorrah

Taken



Becky's Top Ten 2009


Avatar

Trick R Treat

Star Trek

Sherlock Holmes

Inglourious Basterds

The Hangover

Zombieland

Let the Right One In

Drag Me to Hell

A Christmas Carol


Honorable Mention


Taken

Up

District 9

Orphan

Coraline

Monsters Vs Aliens

Harry Potter and the Half - Blood Prince


Well there they are! We will do other top ten lists, so if anyone has a suggestion, please feel free to send an email.

Next time we will pick a film to talk about and give a starred review. If you would like us to review your favorite film, just let us know. However, expect us to be honest and pull no punches.


Thank you for reading our first blog post and please come back for the next one!

I promise it will be longer.